Kirby v. Rosell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OGG, Presiding Judge.
The issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion by granting a motion for new trial on the basis of a juror’s affidavit that the jury considered notes from a business law textbook which were not part of the evidence.
Appellant Robert Kirby brought a complaint against appellees Joe X. and Sharon Rosell alleging fraud in connection with business transactions between the parties. The Rosells denied the allegations and counterclaimed for breach of contract. Following a jury trial, a verdict was returned awarding Kirby $18,000 in damages.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States of America Ex Rel. Craig S. Owen v. Hon. Daniel J. McMann Warden of Auburn State Prison, Auburn, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- People v. HolmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. Jessie Kenneth McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Carter v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Webb v. EricksonArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Keyes v. AmundsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Monaco v. HealthPartners of Southern ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.