Legal Opinion

State v. Randolph

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 2011No. A10-1557PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

The questions presented in this case are: (1) whether the district court erred in ordering a public defender to represent an indigent misdemeanant on appeal; (2) whether the court erred in ordering the public defender system to pay for the representation costs of that appeal; and (3) whether the court erred in ordering the State Public Defender’s office to pay for the transcripts required for that appeal. *153Because the Legislature has not authorized public defenders to represent indigent misdemeanants on appeal, we reverse the district court’s order appointing the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Knox County Council v. State Ex Rel. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State v. FullerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. Castillo-AlvarezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  4. State v. M.D.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Hoekstra v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API