State v. Randolph
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
The questions presented in this case are: (1) whether the district court erred in ordering a public defender to represent an indigent misdemeanant on appeal; (2) whether the court erred in ordering the public defender system to pay for the representation costs of that appeal; and (3) whether the court erred in ordering the State Public Defender’s office to pay for the transcripts required for that appeal. *153Because the Legislature has not authorized public defenders to represent indigent misdemeanants on appeal, we reverse the district court’s order appointing the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Knox County Council v. State Ex Rel. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. Castillo-AlvarezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. M.D.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Hoekstra v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.