Schmidt v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, Justice:
This is an appeal from a property division determination of the Family Court following a divorce. The appellant-husband (“Husband”) 1 appearing pro se, contends that the Family Court’s decision was arbitrary and the result of prejudice on the part of the Trial Judge. The appellee-wife (“Wife”) in addition to answering the merits of Husband’s claim, has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that Husband is the subject of an outstanding capi-as for his arrest for failure to comply with a Family Court order. We decline to permit Husband to pursue this appeal while in defiance…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Greenwood v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- duPont v. duPontCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
- Redden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
3Cited by13 opinions
- DiSabatino v. SaliceteSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Acierno v. HaywardSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Wheeler v. WheelerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Daskin v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
- DiSabatino v. SaliceteSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.