Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 22, 1992PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

This is an appeal from a property division determination of the Family Court following a divorce. The appellant-husband (“Husband”) 1 appearing pro se, contends that the Family Court’s decision was arbitrary and the result of prejudice on the part of the Trial Judge. The appellee-wife (“Wife”) in addition to answering the merits of Husband’s claim, has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that Husband is the subject of an outstanding capi-as for his arrest for failure to comply with a Family Court order. We decline to permit Husband to pursue this appeal while in defiance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greenwood v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. duPont v. duPontCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
  3. Redden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. DiSabatino v. SaliceteSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  2. Acierno v. HaywardSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  3. Wheeler v. WheelerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Daskin v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  5. DiSabatino v. SaliceteSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API