Legal Opinion

DiSabatino v. Salicete

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 12, 1996No. 462, 1994, 23, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

In this appeal from the Family Court, we are required to determine the extent of this Court’s authority to enforce the terms of a supersedeas security undertaking and to impose sanctions against an appellant for alleged violation of the conditions of a stay order. We conclude that this Court possesses inherent authority to require compliance with the conditions of stay orders. We further conclude that appropriate sanctions for such violation may include forfeiture of the security in order to uphold the authority of the Court and to deter future violators.

I

The background of this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. DiSabatino v. SaliceteSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  3. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  4. Schmidt v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  5. Adelaide A.G. v. Peter W.G.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Black v. Division of Child Support Enforcement/Aline BlackSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  2. Eaton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  3. DNARx LLC v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 2024
  4. Eagle Force Holdings v. CampbellSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
  5. In Re AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. Stockholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API