Legal Opinion
DiSabatino v. Salicete
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided January 16, 1996No. 462, 1994, 23, 1995PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
The parties were divorced on July 1, 1993. Thereafter, the appellee, Mary Anne Salicete (“Salicete”) filed a series of petitions for a Rule to Show Cause. Each petition alleged that the appellant, Michael DiSabatino (“DiS-abatino”), had violated prior orders of the Family Court.
The Family Court conducted hearings, made findings of fact, and entered dispositions on several of the petitions. The first order at issue in this appeal was entered on November 16, 1994. It imposed sanctions upon DiSabatino which: placed him on curfew; restricted his driver’s license; and ordered him…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Wilson v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Crumplar v. Superior Court ex rel. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Matter of CantrellSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.