Legal Opinion

Salcido v. Roberts

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1902No. Sac. No. 938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. James A. Louttit, Ira H. Reed, and F. J. Solinsky, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

This is an election contest. Upon a canvass of the returns the board of supervisors found that the appellant had received 252 and the respondent 250 votes for the office of supervisor of San Andreas Township, Calaveras County, and issued their election certificate accordingly. Upon a recount of the ballots in this proceeding, the court decided •that the appellant had received but 226 legal votes, and that the respondent had received 228. A judgment was accordingly entered in favor of the latter, from which the defendant prosecutes this appeal.

1. The court erred in counting for respondent the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Patterson v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Farnham v. BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Bledsoe v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Sweetser v. PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Bloedel v. CromwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Maddux v. WalthallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. McCarthy v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API