Farnham v. Boland
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. Carlton W. Greene, and Burbank G. Somers, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
This is an election contest, brought under the provisions of sections 1111-1127 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and involves the office of public administrator in and for the city and county of San Francisco. Contestant, Farnham, appeals from a judgment rendered against him, whereby it was held that Boland received 203 votes more than Farnham received, and was declared elected. Various rulings of the court, arising upon the admission in evidence of certain ballots for Boland, are urged as error upon this appeal.
In addition to other matters, section 1215 of the Political Code declares, "No…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tebbe v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People ex rel. Lee v. PrewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Lauer v. EstesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Webster v. ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by20 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Bledsoe v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Carwile v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- Patterson v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Kenworthy v. MastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- McGrane v. County of Nez PerceIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.