Alzheimer's Institute of America, Inc. v. Avid Radiopharmaceuticals

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SAVAGE, District Judge.

In its posLtrial motion seeking judgment as a matter of law or a new trial, plaintiff Alzheimer’s Institute of America (“AIA”) challenges the jury verdict finding that Michael Mullan was not the sole inventor and that John Hardy, at least, was a co-inventor of the Swedish mutation inventions that are the patents-in-suit, and that the University of South Florida (“USF”) did not waive its rights to the inventions.1 With the exception of its sufficiency of the evidence argument, AIA’s grounds for judgment as a matter of law are the sáme as those it made…