Legal Opinion
Alzheimer's Institute of America v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 5, 2015No. Case No. 10-cv-00482-EDLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ATTORNEY’S FEES MOTIONS AND DENYING DEFENDANT ELI LILY’S UNDERTAKING MOTION
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge
On April 13, 2015, Defendant Eli Lily & Company (“Defendant Eli Lily”) moved for an award of attorney’s fees and for an undertaking to secure any award of attorney’s fees. On April 21, 2015, Defendant Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Defendant Elan”) also moved for an award of attorney’s fees. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ attorney’s fees motions are GRANTED and Defendant Eh Lily’s undertaking motion is DENIED.
I. RELEVANT FACTUAL…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nicky Laatz, et al. v. Zazzle, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020