Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Voisine

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 2010No. 20090182PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Raymond J. Voisine appeals the district court order finding him a sexually dangerous individual and committing him to the care, custody and control of the Department of Human Services. We reverse and remand, concluding the district court made a legal error by finding that incest between consenting adults falls within the statutory definition of sexually predatory conduct and by omitting findings related to the first and second prongs of the analysis used to determine if Voisine is a sexually dangerous individual.

I

[¶ 2] Voisine is a 65-year-old male with four adult…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Cass County State's Attorney v. R.A.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Cass County State's Attorney v. E.W.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Olson v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In the Interest of PFNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. NakvindaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Enget v. J.T.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In Re AmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Wamstad v. MangelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Binder v. WhitetailNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API