Legal Opinion
Gary Michael Rutledge v. Jerry Sunderland
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 16, 1982No. 78-1976PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Respondent appeals the grant, following remand, of a writ of habeas corpus to the petitioner Rutledge. This case was previously before us as one of those consolidated in Bromley v. Crisp, 561 F.2d 1351, 1358-1360 (10th Cir. 1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 908, 98…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Boudin v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Sterling Energy, Ltd., D/B/A Senco, a Texas Corporation v. Friendly National Bank, an Oklahoma Banking Corporation and George W. Higgins, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Boudin v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Falkner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Brooks v. Barbour Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.