Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Barbour Energy Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 5, 1986No. Nos. 85-1370, 85-1711PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
The appellants are a group of investors consisting of Bert Brooks, Jr., Mary Jane Wolk, M.J. Resources, Inc., and Phyllis Katherin Little (the Brooks Group). The appellee, Barbour Energy Corporation (Barbour), is an Oklahoma corporation engaged in exploring for, acquiring, and developing oil and gas property. It provides investors opportunities to participate in these exploration activities.
Barbour and the Brooks Group entered into a comprehensive written agreement, which the parties referred to as the “Participation Agreement,” concerning the Brooks Group’s participation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mitchum v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Alabama BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Astron Industrial Associates, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Plotner v. AT & T Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Honeycutt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Ladonna Harrison v. Edison Brothers Apparel Stores, Incorporated, and Melvin Wall, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.