Legal Opinion
Sterling Energy, Ltd., D/B/A Senco, a Texas Corporation v. Friendly National Bank, an Oklahoma Banking Corporation and George W. Higgins, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1984No. 83-1424PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Sterling Energy appeals from the district court’s order awarding attorneys fees to Friendly National Bank. Sterling claims the trial court erred in finding that Sterling prosecuted its case against the bank in bad faith. We have concluded that the district court’s order…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. Dasa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- George BADILLO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CENTRAL STEEL & WIRE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Braley v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Bud Brooks Trucking, Inc. v. Bill Hodges Trucking Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Glass v. PfefferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Federal Trade Commission v. Freecom Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. McCallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.