Legal Opinion
United States v. Edward M. Nash
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1999No. 97-1601PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
Edward M. Nash was convicted for the willful failure to file income tax returns for 1991 and 1992, and for the presentation of false, fictitious, or fraudulent tax-refund claims for 1989-1991. He appeals, claiming that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for the presentation of false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims for tax refunds, (2) the district court improperly denied the submission of certain exhibits to the jury, (3) the district court improperly instructed the jury, and (4) the district court erred in its application of sentence…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States of America, Ex Rel. A+ Homecare, Inc. v. Medshares Management Group, Inc. Trevecca Home Health Services, Inc., Stephen H. WintersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. James Thomas McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. John M. Logan (99-6176) Alan Michael Laws(99-6198)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. David MiddletonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Paul Corrado, United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Anthony Corrado, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.