Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul Corrado, United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Anthony Corrado, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 13, 2002No. 01-1561, 01-1658 and 01-1660PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Paul Corrado (“Paul”) and Anthony Corrado (“Anthony”) appeal the district court’s reinstatement of their convictions, following remand, and their sentences following resentencing. The United States cross-appeals Anthony’s sentence. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the reinstatement of the Conrados’ convictions and Paul’s sentence, but we VACATE Anthony’s sentence and REMAND the district court for resentencing.
I. BACKGROUND
Paul and Anthony, along with fifteen others, were charged in a twenty-five count indictment that included two counts under the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- United States v. Torres-RamosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Anthony Dejohn (02-3158) Christopher Harb (02-3175)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Gass v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- B & H Medical, L.L.C. v. ABP Administration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Joseph Lee SeymourCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.