Fairbanks Morse & Co. v. Dees
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
On the first petition for review by certiorari, the single question raised by the opinion of the court of appeals was whether defendants had been entitled to the general affirmative charge in the trial court. After the writ had been awarded, the court of appeals in its responsive opinion ruled that no error had been committed in the refusal of the general charge. With respect to numerous other assignments of error raising other questions of merit, the court of appeals has in its second opinion considered it to be an unprofitable undertaking to set out its reasons in detail for its conclusion…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cranford v. National Surety CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Life Insurance Company of Georgia v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Humphrey v. BoschungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Reichert Milling Co. v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Miller v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.