Legal Opinion

Miller v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 5, 1942No. 6 Div. 39PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

This cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts and was submitted in the court below and in the Court of Appeals upon the merits concerning the proper construction of the insurance contract. The facts being undisputed it is proper we examine the insurance contract and the agreed facts as to the case for the interpretation of the policy as suggested by counsel for the respective parties. Cranford v. National Surety Corp., 231 Ala. 636, 166 So. 721; Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Dees, 220 Ala. 604, 126 So. 621; Hood v. State, 230 Ala. 343, 162 So. 543.

Upon original…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cranford v. National Surety CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Loveman, Joseph Loeb v. New Amsterdam CasualtySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Hood v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Rodgers v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Wentz v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Colbert County Hospital Board, a Corporation, D/B/A Helen Keller Memorial Hospital v. Bellefonte Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. North River Insurance Company v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Wanda A. WelshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Lingo v. Gulf Life Ins. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Taber v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API