Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael James Brady
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1993No. 91-1350PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILBURN, Circuit Judge.
We granted rehearing en banc in this criminal case, thereby vacating the prior decision of a panel of our court, in order to consider the question of whether two armed robberies of different victims at different locations committed approximately thirty minutes apart were “committed on occasions different from one another” within the meaning of the Armed Career Criminal Act (“Act”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1).1 For the reasons that follow, we hold that the robberies in question were committed on different occasions and were separate and distinct criminal episodes. We…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Francisco Sangineto-Miranda, (87-5667) Luray Betts, (87-5668) Enrique Vargas, (87-5711) & Benjamin Nelson, (87-5712)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Larry BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. David D. SchoolcraftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- United States v. Tony Lee ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Thomas L. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Calvin B. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Vincent Jay LetterloughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.