Legal Opinion

Hill v. Breeden

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1938No. 2057PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Chief Justice.

This is a suit brought by Amanda J. Hill, in her individual capacity, and also as administratrix of Richard Breeden, to recover judgment on the note hereinafter mentioned. The court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff personally in the sum of $102.75 and attorney fees and in favor of plaintiff as adminis-tratrix in the sum of $1153.37 and attorney fees. From this judgment the defendant has appealed. The facts material are substantially as follows. The term “plaintiff,” if used in the singular, will refer to her as plaintiff in the trial court in her individual…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lyman v. GedneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Stout v. Van ZanteOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Young v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  4. Bushnell v. ElkinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Lannay v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Scott v. BeamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Goodson & Koski v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Wambeke v. HopkinWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Witzel v. WitzelWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Cantonwine v. FehlingWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API