Legal Opinion

Stout v. Van Zante

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1923PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

The plaintiff and her husband were the owners of real property in Sherman County, Oregon, under a conveyance made to them while husband and wife. .They sold and conveyed the land, taking, for a part of the purchase money, notes made payable to both of them, which are secured by a mortgage upon the land. The husband died testate and the defendant is executor of the will. The notes, for the purposes of administration, are in the possession of the executor, and were listed in the inventory and appraisement as belonging, in equal shares, to the plaintiff and the estate. ' Claiming to be the sole…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bertles v. . NunanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. In Re the Final Accounting of Executors of AlbrechtNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of KlatzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. In re BerryDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1917
  5. Schleef v. PurdyOregon Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Brandrup v. Recontrust Co., N.A.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ganoe v. OhmartOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Beach v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Erickson v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1941

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API