Legal Opinion

Capital City Corp. v. Johnson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 11, 1994No. 92-CV-653PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a foreclosure sale. Appellee Johnson had filed suit in the Superior Court asking that the sale be set aside as “wrongful” and seeking compensatory and punitive damages. Following a two-day non-jury trial, the court voided the foreclosure sale and ordered Johnson to become current on the mortgage payments due and owing to appellant Capital City Corporation. Appellant argues that, because of the absence of an indispensable party, an alleged bona fide purchaser, the trial court erred in failing to dismiss Johnson’s suit.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Perkins v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Flack v. LasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Raskauskas v. Temple Realty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Bank of Montreal v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Francis v. Recycling Solutions, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Kibunja v. Alturas, L.L.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Johnson v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Abdel-Kafi v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Stuart v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API