Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 21, 1999No. 95-CV-980, 95-CV-1066, 96-CV-63PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge.
In 1992, appellant Edmond Johnson, acting under a power of attorney from his wife, obtained a judgment setting aside a foreclosure upon certain real property owned by his wife. On appeal, we remanded the case so that the trial court could make an explicit finding whether the third party who purchased the property after the foreclosure sale was an indispensable party; in all other respects, we affirmed. See Capital City Carp. v. Johnson, 646 A.2d 325 (D.C.1994). 1
After the remand, Johnson attempted to amend or supplement the complaint to seek damages and to name…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ali Baba Co., Inc. v. Wilco, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Kleinbart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Carr v. RoseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Gordon v. Raven Systems & Research, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Manos v. FickenscherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Virginia Academy of Clinical Psychologists v. Group Hospitalization & Medical Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Jung v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Harris v. LadnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Leslie v. LaPradeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Wilson v. HartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.