Legal Opinion

Stuart v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1997No. 96-CV-479PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

James A Stuart, a holder of tax sale certificates for five properties, had to surrender them because the properties were redeemed — three of them after the redemption period had expired — by the original property owners (or, in one case, by a lienholder). He challenges the rate of interest he was paid when he had to accept refunds for the two timely-redeemed properties. He claims the right to damages from the District, or rescission, with respect to the untimely redemp-tions, based on his contention that the properties should be deemed to belong to him as of the times…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Raskauskas v. Temple Realty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bembery v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API