Stuart v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
James A Stuart, a holder of tax sale certificates for five properties, had to surrender them because the properties were redeemed — three of them after the redemption period had expired — by the original property owners (or, in one case, by a lienholder). He challenges the rate of interest he was paid when he had to accept refunds for the two timely-redeemed properties. He claims the right to damages from the District, or rescission, with respect to the untimely redemp-tions, based on his contention that the properties should be deemed to belong to him as of the times…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Raskauskas v. Temple Realty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bembery v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004