Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Irmscher

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 3, 1945No. 5028PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’Connell, Judge,

delivered tlie opinion of the court:

The subject matter of this appeal relates to a delivery counting method and apparatus for handling articles, particularly tea balls, vvhicb. issue in rapid succession from a packaging machine. A folded string-handle is positioned against the flat side of each tea ball for conveniently arranging the tea balls in cartons for shipping.

In his decision on patentability of the claims in appellant’s application for a patent, the Primary Examiner allowed claims 15, 16, and 17 for a specific intermittent, conveyor apparatus; but rejected, as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re AllerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  2. Apple v. AppleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Application of Basil Vivian Aller, Richard Norman Lacey, Reginald Harold HallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  4. In re PhippsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  5. In re JohnsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API