Legal Opinion

In re Phipps

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 4, 1946No. 5104PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in finally rejecting the only claim presented in appellant’s application for a patent for improvements on a cross roller bit particularly designed for use in boring oil wells.

The rejected claim reads—

11. In a roller cutter construction, a frustoconical cutter body, two series of parallel rows of narrow teeth transverse to the axis of the cutter body, each, series extending semicircumferentially around the body on opposite sides and starting from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Western States MacH. Co. v. S. S. Hepworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. In Re StoverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  4. In Re FridolphCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  5. In re IrmscherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frank B. Killian & Co. v. Allied Latex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. In re CoeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  3. Application of FlickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  4. In Re BrennCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. In Re CoeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API