Legal Opinion

In re Johnson

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 17, 1947No. 5312PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in rejecting all the claims, 1 to 6, inclusive, in appellants’ application for the reissue of a patent.

Appellants were the alleged original inventors of a dry, pre-cooked cereal product suitable for infant feeding and a method of preparing the product. They assigned the invention to Mead Johnson & Company and the patent thereon, No. 1,990,329, was issued to the company on February 5,1935.

Mead Johnson & Company sold the product to the public under the trade…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mead Johnson & Co. v. Hillman's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  3. In re IrmscherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  4. In re SussmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  5. In re KrasnowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Georgia Kaolin Co. v. Thiele Kaolin Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. Georgia Kaolin Company, and Cross-Appellee v. Thiele Kaolin Company, and Cross-Appellant, Thiele Kaolin Company, and Cross-Appellant v. Georgia Kaolin Company, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API