United States v. Dear
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
CRAWFORD, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of maltreatment of subordinates (2 specifications), solicitation to commit sodomy (3 specifications), and obstruction of justice, in violation of Articles 93 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 893 and 934, respectively. The convening authority approved the sentence of a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence. We granted review on the following issue:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN DENYING APPELLANT’S…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. FrenchUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. CrafterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. BoyettCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.