United States v. Caldwell
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Judge OHLSON
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Contrary to his pleas, a panel of officer and enlisted members sitting as a general court-martial convicted Appellant, in relevant part, of maltreatment in violation of Article 93, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 893 (2012). We granted review to determine whether the military judge’s instructions were plainly erroneous in light of the Supreme Court’s recent holding in Elonis v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2001, 192 L.Ed.2d 1 (2015). Based on the two factors outlined below, we conclude they were not.
First, because of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. HavertyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
- United States v. FelixNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
- United States v. HavertyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.