Legal Opinion
Veaux v. Southern Oregon Sales, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 13, 1940No. E-9675PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.
This cause was initiated by formal pleadings under the former equity practice. After adoption of the Federal Rules, pretrial procedure was held which eventuated in a thoroughly comprehensive pre-trial order. According to Rule 16, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, this order controls the subsequent course of the action, unless modified at the trial to prevent manifest injustice. A summary of the agreed facts from the order is as follows:
Veaux filed his first application for patent on January 22, 1930. On February 10, 1930, one Ridley filed an application for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Gillons v. Shell Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Shaw v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Ferdinand Gutmann Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Monsanto Company v. Rohm and Haas CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Tomlinson of High Point v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Monsanto Company v. Dawson Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
- Veaux v. Southern Oregon Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941