Legal Opinion
Veaux v. Southern Oregon Sales, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1941No. 9638PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
Appellant sued appellee alleging infringement of his patent by appellee. The court below entered a judgment for appellee adjudicating the patent sued on to be invalid. D.C., 33 F.Supp. 605, 606.
The type of box which has long been used in the Pacific Northwest for packing apples and pears is a box having two thick ends which do not bulge, two sides, of a thickness which permits slight bulging, a thin top adapted to permit it to bulge in conformity with the contents, and a thin bottom, which bulges somewhat less than the top.
The following excerpt from appellant’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- McCarty v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Haughey v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Stoody Co. v. Mills Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Uihlein v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Monsanto Company v. Rohm and Haas CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Dictograph Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
- Monsanto Company v. Dawson Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970