Legal Opinion
Monsanto Company v. Dawson Chemical Company
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided April 14, 1970No. Civ. A. 68-H-400PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
SINGLETON, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement suit between the patentee, plaintiff, and the alleged infringers, defendants, who have counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment nullifying plaintiff’s patent. Plaintiff is a Delaware corporation with its principle place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. Defendant Crystal Chemical Company is a Florida corporation with its principle place of business in Houston, Texas within this judicial district. Defendant Dawson Chemical Company is a Texas corporation that is wholly owned by defendant Crystal Chemical Company and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Muncie Gear Works, Inc. v. Outboard, Marine & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Eli Lilly and Company, Inc. v. Generix Drug Sales, Inc., Caribe Chemical Company, Inc., Ellencee Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc., (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Monsanto Company v. Rohm & Haas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Xerox Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Monsanto Company v. Rohm and Haas CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- In Re Multidistrict Litigation Involving Frost PatentDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.