Legal Opinion
Moser v. Pantages
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 1917No. 13725PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered August 1, 1916, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action for damages.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
— The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages because the defendants failed to pay the premiums upon two life insurance policies. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to the amended complaint. The plaintiff refused to plead further, and an order was entered dismissing the action. The plaintiff has appealed.
The amended complaint, after alleging that the defend*66ants are the owners of two lots in the city of Seattle, is as follows:
“(2) That on or about April 1st, 1914, the said defendants orally employed the plaintiffs to negotiate for them a first mortgage loan upon the within…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller v. AmmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Stirtan v. BlethenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Way v. Pacific Lumber & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Ferguson-Hendrix Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Calvin Phillips & Co. v. FishbackWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Irons Investment Co. v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Western Union Life Insurance v. MusgraveArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Wolfe v. Philippine Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933