Legal Opinion

Ferguson-Hendrix Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1914No. 11575PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered September 6, 1913, dismissing, on the pleadings, an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This is an action to recover for an alleged breach of the conditions of a fidelity bond. A judgment was entered upon the pleadings, dismissing the action. The plaintiff has appealed.

The appellant, a commission merchant, employed one Busey as bookkeeper and cashier and took from the respondent, a compensated surety, a bond, wherein it agreed to reimburse the appellant to the extent of the bond for any pe*529cuniary loss it should sustain “by reason of any personal act or acts of fraud or dishonesty” committed by Busey in the performance of his duties as bookkeeper and cashier. It is alleged that,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. AmmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. State ex rel. Beek v. WagenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Clark's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Stirtan v. BlethenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Way v. Pacific Lumber & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Treffry v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Argo Oil Corporation v. AtwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State v. Bowen & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Italia America Shipping Corp. v. NelsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  5. City of Tucson v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API