Wolfe v. Philippine Investment Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was based upon an oral contract, and its purpose was to recover for services rendered by the plaintiff to the defendant. The answer was a general denial. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to recover. Judgment was entered against the defendant in the sum of $675, from which it appeals.
The facts are these: The appellant, the Philippine Investment Company, is a corporation organized under the laws of this state, with its principal place of business in the city of Seattle, and one…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maitland v. ZangaWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Calvin Phillips & Co. v. FishbackWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Vittucci Co. v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- Moser v. PantagesWashington Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rathke v. Yakima Valley Grape Growers Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Werber v. WallopDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946