Carlson v. Herbert
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from judgments of the superior court for King county, Hall, J., entered December 11,1920, upon verdicts of a jury rendered in favor of tbe plaintiffs, in consolidated actions for personal injuries sustained by pedestrians struck by an automobile.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— Respondents Albert R. Carlson and Ida M. Carlson, bis wife, and Ethel Anna Carlson, by Albert R. Carlson, her guardian ad litem, brought separate actions against tbe appellants, George W. Herbert and tbe Mutual Union Insurance Company, a corporation, alleging, that tbe defendant Herbert was tbe owner and operated an automobile for hire as a jitney on tbe streets of Seattle; that tbe Mutual Union Insurance Company is a corporation licensed to issue bonds for indemnity and become surety on bonds of tbe kind sued upon in these actions; that it was surety on Herbert’s bond, given and filed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gregg v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Sheffield v. Union Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Lindstrom v. Seattle Taxicab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sweazey v. Valley Transport, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940