Legal Opinion

Lindstrom v. Seattle Taxicab Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1921No. 16416PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered December 11, 1920, upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Respondent as plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries. Prom a verdict against them in the sum of $2,000, and a judgment entered thereon, the defendants have appealed.

The only eyewitnesses to the accident who testified upon the trial, were the respondent and the appellant Erickson, the driver of the taxicab. Respondent testified in substance that, at the time in question, he walked *308down Fourth avenue, in the city of Seattle, to James street, where he stopped for an instant because there was an automobile passing' in one direction, and a street car coming from the other;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. Union Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Mott Iron Works v. Metropolitan BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Heva v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. City of Tacoma v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Carlson v. HerbertWashington Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API