Legal Opinion

Larsen v. United States Navy

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 18, 2004No. 02-2005 (RMU)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendants’

Motion to Dismiss

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs, Charles Larsen, Gregory McNear, David Myers and James Linzey, are four non-liturgical Protestant ministers who applied for but were denied commissions in the Navy Chaplain Corps (“the Corps”). They bring suit against the Navy and the Secretary of the Navy (“defendants”) to challenge “the systematic and pervasive religious prejudice in the accession decisions of the Corps.” Compl. ¶…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Larsen v. US NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  2. Buaiz v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. Larsen v. United States NavyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Reading v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  5. Pollinger v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API