Legal Opinion

Haring v. Myrick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1962No. Docket 35, 36, Calendar 49,742, 49,743PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

At common law, a master is liable for injuries negligently inflicted by his servant upon another only when the servant is then acting within the scope of his employment. Hartley v. Miller, 165 Mich 115 (33 LRA NS 81, NCCA 126); Riley v. Roach, 168 Mich 294 (37 LRA NS 834); and Brinkman v. Zuckerman, 192 Mich 624. If a negligent injury occurs while the servant is engaged in pursuit of his own affairs and not those of his master, it makes no difference, ordinarily, that the injury is inflicted by use of an instrumentality belonging to the master. Brinkman v. Zuckerman, supra, 628. However, by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hartley v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Brinkman v. ZuckermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Elliott v. A. J. Smith Contracting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Riley v. RoachMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Stafford v. Far-Go Van Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Chapman v. BuderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Gerard v. SmallMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Chapman v. BuderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API