Legal Opinion

Brinkman v. Zuckerman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1916No. Docket No. 124PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Case in justice’s court by Frank E. Brinkman against Leo Zuckerman for damages to plaintiff’s property. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtPerson, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for an injury to plaintiff’s property, caused by the running of an automobile against the front of his store. The automobile was owned by defendant, and was being driven at the time by one Mclvoy, who was employed by defendant generally as a chauffeur. In the absence of any statute enlarging the responsibility of the owner, defendant’s liability depends upon whether the chauffeur, when the accident occurred, was acting as his servant and within the scope of his employment. The trial judge held that he was not, and directed a verdict against plaintiff.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. WallerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. Reilly v. . ConnableNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Steffen v. McNaughtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Danforth v. FisherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  5. Quinn v. . PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Moore v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Southwest Dairy Products Co. v. DefratesTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Cebulak v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Curry v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Dowdell v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API