Legal Opinion
Jonas v. Dunn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 26, 1928No. 18320PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIFFENDAFFER, C.
The parties will be- referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff in error was plaintiff below and defendants in error were defendants below.
The amended petition, upon which the cause was tried, alleged substantially that plaintiff is a member of the Choctaw Tribe of Indians, being enrolled as a new born opposite roll No. _, and that as such member there was allotted to her as her surplus allotment the N. E. 14, sec. 26, twp. 2 S., R. 4 W.; that she was the owner in fee simple thereof; that defendants were each and all claiming some right, title, or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cooper v. FlesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Creek Land & Improvement Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Winsted v. ShankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Gay v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eckel v. AdairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,782 Janet Watkins v. Gregory L. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Soulé v. Gragg (In re Harrison)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2013
- Limb v. AldridgeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Mashburn v. ArzateUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.