Legal Opinion

Weitz v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1934No. 13547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By ROSS, J.

The .record shows that the false certificate was made by the plaintiff in error, not as a director, but as Secretary. The conclusion of the Supreme Court in State of Ohio v Williams, 104 Oh St, 232, 238, is directly in point. The procedure in the Williams case was appropriate to the instant case. The secretary was there indicted for perjury under the general statute. §13190, GC, as held in the Williams case- is not appropriate for an indictment of a secretary for a false report made by liim as such.

The second assignment of error'is, that the prosecutor was guilty of gross…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crobaugh, Kimmel & Casler v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HuffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. CloudOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Abney v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. State v. ConradOhio Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API