Legal Opinion

State v. Conrad

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1969No. 444PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, P. J.

Defendant, appellant herein, filed a motion to permit the correction of the bill of exceptions by appending thereto excerpts from the closing argument of the prosecuting attorney, which included the following statement: “I believe that the defendant is guilty,” to which counsel for defendant objected.

Plaintiff, appellee herein, filed a motion to permit the filing of a complete bill of exceptions, because defendant had only filed a partial bill of exceptions consisting of part of the closing argument of the prosecuting attorney.

Defendant contends that the above statement of the prosecuting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. NeviusOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. ThayerOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. State v. CloudOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Jones v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Ohio v. BrandOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API