Legal Opinion
Comerford v. Meier
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 27, 1939PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
The declaration in this action of tort alleges that the plaintiff is an officer and employee of a certain corporation, referred to as a bank; that in 1934 he opposed the employment by the bank of one Sontag; and that certain of the defendants, for the purpose of securing such employment for Sontag and for the purpose of ousting the plaintiff from his employment with the bank, "combined, confederated and agreed” among themselves and later with the remaining defendants upon a plan which included the following activities: (a) They have induced the stockholders of the bank, some of whom "are the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Berry v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Beekman v. MarstersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Moran v. DunphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Bander v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Fleming v. DaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Stockus v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Merit Oil Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of LifeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.