Faulkner v. Hendy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court and in the opinion reported in 80 Cal. 806.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This is an action for an accounting, and has been pending seventeen years. This is the second appeal to this court, the first being reported in 80 Cal. 636, where a full statement of the facts may be found. Prior to the entry of the judgment which was before the court on the first appeal, the amount of money belonging to Steen which defendant Hendy had received was fixed by stipulation. On the sum so agreed upon the *18court allowed interest at the rate of one and one-quarter per cent per month, compounded monthly. The defendant appealed, complaining of this rate of interest. One…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harris v. San Francisco Sugar Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1871
- Thompson v. PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Falkner v. HendyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by11 opinions
- Estate of ArmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Chiarodit v. ChiaroditCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Lewis v. GrunbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Duniway v. BartonOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- National Brass Works v. WeeksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.