Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Patterson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,410PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from an order denying the defendant a new trial, in the Twelfth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Daingerfield, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Department No. 1, McKee, J.:

This case and three other cases, by an order made by the *545Court below upon: a stipulation of the parties, were referred to a referee to take and state an account, in the first case, between the plaintiff and the defendant, and to try and determine the rights of the parties in all the cases, and “ to declare the same by proper findings of fact and of law.”

Pursuant to the stipulation, the referee tried the four cases, and on April 30th, 1874, filed his report, findings, and conclusions of law. Defendant in the Court below gave notice of intention to move for a new…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boyce v. California Stage Co.California Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Harris v. San Francisco Sugar Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Fawkes v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Saint Croix Lumber Co. v. PenningtonSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1881
  4. Rossi v. ZappaterraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Faulkner v. HendyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API