Falkner v. Hendy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This action was commenced in March, 1876, by Falkner, as assignee of Steen. In the course *637of the litigation the cause of action was reassigned to Steen, who was thereupon substituted as plaintiff. The complaint alleges the formation of a partnership between Steen and Hendy in 1873, under an agreement the terms of which are fully set out; the carrying on of business in pursuance of the agreement until May, 1875; the dissolution of the copartnership at that date by plaintiff; retention of all the partnership assets by the defendant, and refusal to account. The prayer is, that the partnership be…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Falkner v. HendyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- McNulty v. CoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Niles v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Faulkner v. HendyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Griffeth v. FehselCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.