Legal Opinion

Feuget v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 12, 2015No. CR-13-885PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhonda K. Wood, Associate Justice

11 Michael Feuget appeals the denial of his petition for postconviction relief under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37. Feuget contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel during his trial because: (1) his attorneys failed to present certain witness testimony to corroborate his affirmative defense of involuntary intoxication and impeach the testimony of an adverse witness; and (2) his attorneys failed to request a jury instruction on a lesser-ineluded offense. We affirm the circuit court’s ruling.

I. Relevant Facts

Feuget robbed a bank on January 15, 2010. At trial, he defended…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Henington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Sartin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Noel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Rasul v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Fukunaga v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Adkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Flemons v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Lacy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API