Legal Opinion
Smith v. Minneapolis Threshing MacH. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 6, 1923No. 10805PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBranson, J.
This suit is on promissory notes and for foreclosure of a real estate mortgage as security thereto, in which the defendant in error, Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co., a corporation, recovered judgment against 'the plaintiffs in error for the sum sued for, and foreclosing the real estate mortgage. Heinke & Co. was a party defendant in the action, because it had a judgment lien upon the real estate in question. The plaintiff in the court below will be referred to herein as plaintiff, and the defendants Smith will be referred to as defendants.
On May 2S, 1915, the defendant, William X. Smith,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoxie v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
- Swedish American National Bank of Minneapolis v. KoebernickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Lewis v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- Robertson v. U. S. Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Stuart v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sandpiper North Apartments, Ltd. v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
- Continental Mutual Savings Bank v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Murphy Oil USA Inc v. Trivental IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.