Legal Opinion

State Mut. Ins. Co. v. Craig

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1910No. 417PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Grant County; 17. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by Prank Craig against the State Mutual Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The policy on which the action was based in the lower court was issued on April 11, 1906, by the assurer, a corporation organized under the laws of the territory of Oklahoma. A loss having occurred under the policy, suit was brought thereon in the district court of Grant county, territory of Oklahoma, on the 7th day of February, 1907, which was pending and undetermined at the time of the admission of the state into the Union.

Section 1 of the Schedule to the Constitution provides that:

“No existing rights, actions, suits, proceedings, contracts-or claims shall be affected by the change in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Sullivan v. Mercantile Town Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Deming Investment Co. v. Shawnee Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  5. St. Louis & S. F. R. v. CundieffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Western Nat. Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API