Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska State Railway Commission

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1950No. 32760PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company commenced this proceeding before the Nebraska State Railway Commission to secure permission to discontinue motor passenger trains numbered 15 and 16 which are operated daily between Lincoln, Nebraska, and the Iowa-Nebraska state line near Sioux City, Iowa. No formal objections were filed to the application, but citizens from five of the communities served by the trains in question appeared and testified in opposition to their discontinuance. The commission, after public hearing, denied the application and the railroad company appeals.

Trains…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Municipalities of HoldregeNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Moritz v. Transcontinental Bus Lines, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Richling v. Transit, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Fleming v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Clinchfield RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API